relates to China's major trade interests

xinhuanet.com Geneva 7 July, appellate body of the World Trade Organization ruled 7, USA commerce department between 2006 and 2012, China launched 25 anti-dumping and countervailing investigation in violation of WTO rules.

WTO day released the report China Cheap Coyotes Jerseys v. revision America tariff Cheap Blue Jackets Jerseys act the WTO dispute case appellate body, made the decision.

The

appellate body rejected the appeal request, supports China on the double relief aspects, that failed to America commerce department between 2006 and 2012, China launched 25 anti-dumping countervailing investigation to avoid double relief tax adjustment, in violation of the WTO rules.

The

appellate body support China most appeal, that group of experts to explain "article 10.2" general agreement on Tariffs and trade in 1994 and applicable to the Tariff Act Amendment of errors. But due to lack of experts on the facts of the case analysis, the appellate body fails to complete the analysis of the Tariff Act Amendment is consistent with WTO rules.

2012 year in September, the United Chinese shut against WTO rules of tax law amendment bill in the wrong way, put forward and the WTO dispute settlement mechanism to negotiate, officially Cheap Hurricanes Jerseys start the WTO dispute settlement procedures.

the Chinese side think, since 2006, America in the lack of domestic legal basis of cases, China continuous anti subsidy investigation. In the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit clear decision the right to non market economy country countervailing investigation, in 2012 March through the "beauty of revised 1930 year tax law" case, authorized Cheap Predators Jerseys the U. S. Department of Commerce to countervailing measures applicable to non market economy country, legitimacy and retroactive to the ratification of the previous survey; the United States that will China enterprises in an uncertain legal environment, in violation of the relevant rules on transparency and due process of WTO.

2012 year in November, China to set up expert groups, in December the same year, the establishment of the expert group.

2014 year in March, Cheap Bruins Jerseys WTO expert group award, the 25 anti-dumping countervailing measures in violation of the WTO rules, but that the Tariff Act Amendment did not violate WTO rules. In April 8, 2014 and 17, the two sides were on a panel ruling on the appeal.

in the WTO Appellate Body report released the day after Chinese award, Ministry of Commerce issued a statement saying, this case is the following Chinese V US anti-dumping and countervailing measures after the case, and a major victory for the use of legal weapons to challenge the abuse of trade remedy measures, has important influence.

Chinese Commerce Department said, this case products export value of more than $7200000000, relates to China's major trade interests, China urged the United States to respect WTO award, mistake to correct the abuse of trade remedy measures as soon as possible, to ensure that the competition China Enterprises Fair environment.

(original title: WTO Appellate Body ruling American China 25 double reverse survey violate WTO rules)