the two sides of the shelf life of check

A

date on food packaging, buyers think warranty expiry date, shopkeepers argue that is commodity production date. Recently, the Changning District court heard the case in dispute case, the court house to "take a paid ten".

in March this year, Mr. Yan bought 10 bottles of 88 yuan at the "full green plum fruit vinegar" in a Cheap Knicks Hats supermarket, a total payment of 880 yuan. The simplified Chinese label production date of Cheap Heat Hats November 6, 2013 to November 5, 2016, shelf life. But he found, according to the commodity packaging characters marked as well as the date on the box, November 6, 2013 for the due date, the sale of goods has more than shelf-life. So, he grounds to the court to the supermarket sale does not conform to the food safety standards of food, "take a paid ten for supermarket".

the supermarket has said, the plaintiff in Cheap Nuggets Hats the purchase of the goods, the two sides of the shelf life of check, cashier in shopping ticket stamped "sell goods not shelf-life" seal. The Cheap Hornets Hats goods in the import, by the State Quality Inspection Cheap Clippers Hats Administration detection qualified to be the record. Once again, the origin of goods in Taiwan, according to dealers, manufacturers use the old packaging box for the date is wrong, it should be based on the simplified Chinese label inspection mark content.

after two times of trial, the court said, according to the description of the goods in the original packaging and tagging content, printing date "2013.11.6" apparently commercial maturity, the defendant argued that has no basis in fact. The goods have been more than shelf-life at the time of sale.

The court held that the defendant

, selling expired food belong to breach of contract, the original tell please refund shopping 880 yuan with the facts and legal basis. At the same time, the defendant as enterprise legal person, shall knowingly expired food does not conform to the food safety standards and selling expired food illegal and harmful, and the obligation to avoid the expired food. Therefore, the plaintiff asked the defendant to pay the price of ten times compensation 8800 litigation request, also have the facts and legal basis. Then according to the relevant provisions of the law, the above judgment.